100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Trampoline company ordered to pay compensation over accident

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Plan to add extra sites to $35m creekside tourist park

The family pushing for a new festival site on the Sunshine Coast is planning to build a $35 million tourist park nearby. Coochin Creek Property, More

Road to recovery starts at landslip sites

Works have started on repairing two sections of a key inland road damaged by floods two years ago. The Department of Transport and Main Roads More

Coffee plantation nears first commercial harvest

A coffee plantation that opened earlier this year will soon begin processing and roasting its own beans, so it can serve coffee that has More

Proposal to increase town centre building limit to 15 storeys

Community consultation has opened regarding a proposal to amend the planning framework to allow for more residential development in an emerging town centre. Sunshine Coast More

Sami Muirhead: finding avocado perfection

Holy guacamole! I bring you exciting news if you love your Mexican food and margaritas. And if you do not love this delicious duo, well, you More

Architecturally designed waterfront oasis up for auction

A Minyama property auction is expected to turn heads this weekend as an agent urges people to get into the “hot market” as quickly More

A man who hurt his foot on a trampoline has been awarded costs on top of almost $750,000 compensation from a Sunshine Coast-based company.

Supreme Court judge Melanie Hindman, in a decision published last week, determined that Springfree Trampolines Australia should pay for costs incurred by Phill Forostenko in seeking compensation following the injury.

Judge Hindman decided last month that Kunda Park-based Springfree Trampolines Australia should pay Mr Forostenko $744,145 in compensation over the incident.

Mr Forostenko, a Brisbane physiotherapist, took the company to court after fracturing his foot on a Springfree 092 trampoline at his sister’s place on Christmas Day 2017.

He suffered a “dancer’s fracture” – a fracture to the fifth metatarsal – in his right foot when he accidentally bounced to the side of the trampoline.

He claimed he felt immediate pain when his foot hit webbing along the edge of the trampoline mat, which covered hard plastic cleats.

Mr Forostenko underwent surgery to have a plate and screws inserted, which resulted in infection, and continuing pain ensued.

He contended Springfree Trampolines Australia was liable for damages because there was no warning that the cleats were there or they should not be jumped upon, and that the net surrounding the trampoline did not exclude the part where the cleats were.

He had been unable to return to work in his full capacity, unable to resume certain sports, and could not do all the usual lawn and garden maintenance he once did because of the pain, which was constant but aggravated with use.

Mr Forostenko sought $3.92 million in compensation, while Springfree Trampolines Australia contended $160,000 was more appropriate.

Judge Hindman found the cleat, combined with the depression of the trampoline mat, had the potential to lead to injury, and that, combined with the lack of warning, constituted a safety defect.

The compensation payout awarded to Mr Forostenko included more than $388,000 for past economic loss and $225,000 for future economic loss.

Springfree Trampolines Australia and Mr Forostenko were both contacted for comment.

Springfree still has time to lodge an appeal against the court decision.

Help us deliver more news by registering for our FREE daily news feed. All it requires is your name and email at the bottom of this article.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share