100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Rejection of retirement facility proposal prompts Planning and Environment Court appeal

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Suspect tobacco stores forced to temporarily close

Two stores in a Sunshine Coast town have been forced to close for three days this week by authorities enforcing tobacco and vape laws. Interim More

Nursery to spend $350,000 to stay open in fire ant zone

A wholesale nursery in a biosecurity zone surrounding the Sunshine Coast’s most recent fire ant discoveries expects to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars More

Tele-trouble: Coast communications complaints surge

Sunshine Coast residents are finding it hard to stay connected. The region has been named among the top five in Australia for complaints to the More

‘More than just a dream’: Coast trio lights up singing show

A family from the Sunshine Coast is making waves on a TV singing contest, with three singers gracing the stage in pursuit of their More

Photo of the day: comet over current

Nick Collins snapped this photo of a comet (ATLAS) from Fishermans Road at Maroochydore in January. "The comet was faint but visible, low in More

Feedback period extended for dog area changes

Sunshine Coast Council has extended the window to provide feedback on its draft Dog Exercise Area Plan and Network Blueprint, after requests from residents. People More

The developer of one of the Sunshine Coast’s largest masterplanned communities is taking the local council to court after it refused an application to build a retirement facility.

AVID Property Group, the developer of the Harmony estate at Palmview, has lodged an appeal with the Planning and Environment Court over Sunshine Coast Council’s refusal of the proposal.

The developer had applied to establish a resort-style land-lease retirement community with 94 dwellings and ancillary facilities on 22 hectares at 65 Vantage Way, Palmview, part of the Harmony estate.

The development application was initially made in September 2022, with the council ultimately giving notice of its decision to refuse the application in July this year.

Among the reasons the council gave for its decision were an “unacceptable risk to people and property resulting from bushfire hazard”, with the proposed use as a retirement facility constituting a “vulnerable use” under the State Planning Policy.

“The subject site is mapped under the provisions of the State Planning Policy 2017 as containing a Potential Impact Buffer on its northern, eastern and southern portions, and is mapped as Very High Potential Bushfire Intensity on its eastern and southern portions,” the council’s decision notice stated.

An aerial image of the subject site in 2021. Picture: Nearmap

The council also ruled that the proposal did not comply with guidelines for safety and legibility of the road layout, and there was insufficient setback of the front fence.

Court documents, lodged on August 16 on behalf of AVID by Brisbane-based lawyers Cooper Grace Ward, state that any non-compliance, which it did not admit to, could be addressed through relevant conditions and did not warrant refusal of the application.

“Bushfire planning for the land … demonstrates that bushfire risk can be appropriately mitigated and managed to an acceptable or tolerable level (and) is supported by the Queensland Fire and Emergency Services, which has confirmed that the appellant’s planning is ‘sound and covers everything the community could expect during a bushfire event’,” they state.

Want more free local news? Follow Sunshine Coast News on Facebook, LinkedIn and Instagram, and sign up for our FREE daily news email.

The documents also argue the development would have a low-speed traffic environment in the south-east corner of Harmony, where roads serve a local function only, and that it would achieve appropriate transport and parking outcomes.

They also state that council’s requirement for a three-metre landscape strip to the front fence “is in error”.

“The retirement facility can be serviced with all necessary infrastructure to support the development; (and) there is a community and economic need for the proposed development,” the documents state.

An AVID Property Group spokesperson confirmed the developer was appealing the council’s decision.

“AVID is extremely disappointed with the Sunshine Coast Council’s decision to refuse our application to develop important land-lease housing neighbouring our established Harmony community,” they said.

An impression of a proposed sales and admin office at the retirement facility. Picture: Habitat Studio Architects

“We strongly disagree with council’s position relating to boundaries and bushland setbacks, and advice from multiple independent experts confirms our position. It is on this basis we have appealed council’s decision.

“As this is now before the Planning and Environment Court, we will not be making any further comments at this time.

“We would like to reassure the broader community that this decision does not impact plans for the existing Harmony masterplanned development.”

Sunshine Coast Council was contacted but declined to comment with the matter before the court.

No further dates for the appeal to be heard have yet been set.

The aerial imagery in this story is from Australian location intelligence company Nearmap. The company provides government organisations, architectural, construction and engineering firms, and other companies, with easy, instant access to high-resolution aerial imagery, city-scale 3D content, artificial intelligence data sets, and geospatial tools to assist with urban planning, monitoring and development projects in Australia, New Zealand and North America.

Do you have an opinion to share? Submit a Letter to the Editor at Sunshine Coast News via news@sunshinecoastnews.com.auYou must include your name and suburb.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share