100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Council outlines reasons to retain fluoride in local water network

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Man strangled wife believing she stole his ID cards

A man strangled his wife at a hotel on Valentine's Day while suffering a drug-induced psychosis that sparked paranoia she had stolen his driver's More

Water safety a priority during warm long weekend

Beachgoers and boaties have been urged to be vigilant during a warm and busy Australia Day long weekend. Thousands of people are expected to flock More

Jane Stephens: working at making great friends

Children are actively encouraged to make friends. They are pushed together with those close in age at family gatherings. Parents drive children to play dates, More

‘A rare gem’: tightly held waterfront home ‘not to miss’

An “immaculate” home perched on the Mooloolah River with an over-water deck is being described as a “rare gem”. With 18 metres of water frontage, More

‘Run out of money’: homeless charity forced to fold

A charity that provided temporarily relief to those impacted by the continuing housing crisis has been forced to wind up. Sleepbus, which arrived on the Sunshine More

Businessman fires up over power loss in face of price hike

The boss of a popular seafood business that was forced to shut during a power outage has queried a six-figure electricity bill increase when More

Noosa Council says it has no plans to remove fluoride from the local water supply.

A mayoral minute from Frank Wilkie outlined his stance, which was supported unanimously by councillors at yesterday’s ordinary meeting.

The minute cited the reasons not to, including the logistical complexity of isolating Noosa water from the South-East Queensland water grid; the cost to ratepayers; the potential weakening of Noosa’s water security in times of drought; and the weight of advice from credible water authorities.

The minute detailed the water quality, logistical and financial aspects, which it estimated at more than $20 million by 2013 figures.

“Isolating Noosa from the interconnected water grid to remove fluoride would likely result in delivery of poor water security for the community,” it stated.

“Cessation of fluoride would require alterations to the existing connections with Seqwater and Unitywater distribution systems. Council would be required the bear the costs.

Do you have an opinion to share? Submit a Letter to the Editor at Sunshine Coast News via news@sunshinecoastnews.com.auYou must include your name and suburb.

“Cessation of fluoride would require alterations to the existing connections with Seqwater  and the Unitywater distribution system to cease dosing at Noosa, removing fluoride flowing north to Noosa and fluoridating water heading the south and adding connection points.

“In accordance with the Act (Water Fluoridation Act 2008), council would be required to bear the costs associated with a decision to withdraw fluoride from drinking water.

“Unitywater and Seqwater would be entitled to recover additional and ongoing financial costs from council that are incurred because of a decision to cease fluoridation.”

It also outlined health aspects.

“Water fluoridation is supported by Queensland Health and has been endorsed as a safe and effective public health measure by more than 150 science and health organisations,” it said.

“There is reliable evidence that community water fluoridation at current Australian levels is not associated with cancer, Down syndrome, cognitive dysfunction, lowered intelligence or hip fracture or other human health conditions, and existing bodies of evidence consistently shows that water fluoridation reduces tooth decay.”

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share