100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

100% Locally Owned, Independent and Free

Applicant contests council refusal of hinterland visitor accommodation

Do you have a news tip? Click here to send to our news team.

Demand for multiple lanes at motorway choke point

Hundreds of people are pressing the state government to add more lanes to a section of motorway that brings traffic to a crawl. A change.org More

Further industrial action set to impact garbage collections

There is set to be further interruptions to garbage collections in Noosa Shire as negotiations over a wage increase drag on. Waste collection service to More

Celebration planned to mark school’s 150 years

Past students will return from around Australia to join present students in celebrating the 150th anniversary of a Sunshine Coast school this year. Buderim Mountain More

Urban terraces to waterfront blocks: final release in ‘premier’ estate

A residential development combining inner-city and coastal lifestyle is nearing completion as it cements itself as the ‘beating heart’ of a Sunshine Coast suburb. Described More

Jane Stephens: the power of rituals

Wearing odd socks when giving a presentation, because thinking of something silly helps keep nerves under control. Being sure to peel the skin off an More

Photo of the day: early splash

Sunrise swimmers at Kings Beach, by Lesley Evans. If you have a photo of the day offering, email photo@sunshinecoastnews.com.au. Photos must be horizontal/landscape and may More

An appeal has been lodged against Sunshine Coast Council’s refusal of an application for a short-stay accommodation complex on a scenic route.

The Geoffrey Thomas Family Trust had applied to the council for a material change of use to allow development of 38 short-term accommodation units at 862-894 Landsborough-Maleny Road, Bald Knob.

A majority of councillors voted against the application on January 30 after a development assessment report recommended it be refused for various reasons, including the proposal’s failure to protect scenic views.

Presidential Capital, as trustee for the Geoffrey Thomas Family Trust, has made an application to the Planning and Environment Court requesting the decision be overturned and the development be approved.

In a notice of appeal, it says the proposed development meets the assessment benchmarks identified by the council and will protect the scenic amenity of the area.

An impression of the complex from one level looking towards another. Picture: Place Design Group

The notice says the proposed development will continue to “preserve, protect, maintain and enhance the visual, landscape and scenic amenity values of the locality” so the scenic route “will continue to provide a high level of scenic and visual amenity”.

It says the proposed development does not detract from the visual amenity of the scenic route, is “visually unobtrusive relative to its setting” when viewed from the scenic route, and it maintains or enhances views from the scenic route.

Although the council, in its reasons for refusal, described the bulk and scale of the development as “urban in nature” and of an “intensity and scale that is not expected in a rural precinct”, the notice of appeal describes the proposed development as low key, both visually and in scale, so as to not detract from the scenic amenity offered from the scenic route.

A diagram showing the line of sight over the buildings from Landsborough-Maleny Road. Picture: Norman Richards Building Design and Interiors

The notice says the proposed development is located and designed to protect the landscape values and amenity of surrounding premises.

It says it will integrate with and complements the predominantly rural character of the area, and “sensitively responds” to the environmental and landscape.

“The proposed development will not impact on local views of importance and those views continue to be protected,” it says.

The notice says there is a need for the development, which will support nearby non-residential uses and provide economic benefit.

It says the development would not cause any more negative impact than lawful activities on the land that do not need a development approved.

The council is yet to respond.

Subscribe to SCN’s free daily news email

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
[scn_go_back_button] Return Home
Share